On his birthday in 2020, Walter Hood planted six bushes in entrance of his home. That very same yr, he tore out the concrete parking strip and planted a dozen extra. Now youngsters come by to select his lemons. It’s not a lot, he says, nevertheless it’s an funding in Oakland’s future.
Hood, a UC Berkeley professor and the artistic director of Hood Design Studio, has lived for 25 years in West Oakland, the place tree cover protection is a mere 5% — the bottom in Oakland, in keeping with a report by Oakland Public Works. Hood and others like him are planting bushes as a result of the town will not be.
Throughout the 2008 recession, the town eradicated all avenue tree planting, watering, and pruning companies, aside from pruning in hazardous or emergency conditions, leaving residents like Hood to plant and keep bushes on their very own.
With out the town’ oversight, extra bushes in Oakland are dying than are being planted.
Oakland has misplaced 275 acres of tree protection since 2014, a metropolis presentation reveals. And lots of the tree removals had been preventable. With out intervention, the pattern is anticipated to proceed.

Tree cover covers about 22% of the town. However the proportion is way much less in East and West Oakland, which, consequently, expertise the most well liked temperatures, in keeping with the 2021 Oakland Public Works report. With out bushes, floor and air temperatures rise, which might improve air air pollution, power use and prices, in addition to heat-related sickness.
Whereas residents have accomplished their half, many don’t have the time or cash to spend on bushes.
“In case you’re struggling to pay your mortgage in East Oakland and a tree service goes to run you about three grand, that’s not a service that lots of people are going to prioritize,” says Ruben Leal, arborist and Fruitvale native. “In case you’re coping with poverty, violence or different points which are in our neighborhood, bushes are the least of your worries.”
Leal says cultural variations additionally result in completely different views on bushes.
“Research present that bushes create a safer neighborhood,” he says. “However I’ve talked to people from my neighborhood, within the hood, and bushes make it darker at night time, so that they don’t really feel secure. They’d somewhat not have the tree and really feel safer.”
Historically, many individuals of colour do tree service jobs, Leal notes, however there are few in management roles. For that motive, Leal is finding out city arboriculture at Merritt School and hopes to make arboriculture extra accessible to his neighborhood.

Many Oakland residents are utilizing grants or their very own cash to plant and look after bushes. However these initiatives typically aren’t sustainable.
Hood led his UC Berkeley undergraduate college students in a tree-planting initiative in 2015, funded by a grant from his college’s School of Environmental Design. They began by giving 120 oak seedlings to Prescott Elementary Faculty in West Oakland. The varsity deliberate to incubate the bushes and replant them in about 5 years, however after a change in class management, Hood says, that by no means occurred.
The situation will not be uncommon, says Janet Cobb, govt officer of the California Wildlife Basis and its California Oaks challenge
“Folks get so excited. They get a bit little bit of seed cash, however they by no means get the follow-up cash,” she says.
Cobb and Hood agree that for long-term impression, the town and the neighborhood should discover a method to collaborate.

In line with Kevin Mulvey, board director for Timber for Oakland, there are alternatives to collaborate forward.
Timber for Oakland is a volunteer-based group that vegetation and maintains bushes, significantly in areas with little tree protection. Timber for Oakland was initially a part of Sierra Membership Tree Staff, which was created in response to the town reducing its tree upkeep program. Oakland residence and enterprise homeowners can request a tree in entrance of their property, however it’s not first come first serve, Mulvey mentioned. They prioritize planting in areas the place there are a number of requests, to make volunteer days extra environment friendly.
Timber for Oakland responded to the town’s name for a service supplier to conduct neighborhood outreach this yr for a brand new City Forest Grasp Plan. The grasp plan, which the town will launch later this yr or early subsequent yr, will decide how one can look after neighborhood bushes over the subsequent 50 years. Timber for Oakland solicited neighborhood enter and offered suggestions.
“It’s very important from the volunteer tree planting neighborhood’s perspective that this City Forest Grasp Plan be a collaborative endeavor,” Mulvey mentioned.
Mulvey hopes the town will share a draft of the grasp plan earlier than it’s finalized.
Town didn’t reply to a request for an interview in regards to the City Forest Grasp Plan.
Hood will not be satisfied {that a} grasp plan is the reply to the tree disparity in Oakland.
“This concept that now we have of planning, and planning, and planning — it will get in the best way of direct motion. You’re making a bureaucratic course of the place nobody is accountable,” Hood says. “So simply to have a mayor saying, ‘We’re going to plant 1,000,000 bushes within the subsequent two years. Let’s do it.’ That’s a grasp plan proper there.”
This story was printed in collaboration with The Oaklandside.